Posts Tagged ‘Houses’
Buying investment property with investment clubs – My Story Part 3.
Walker Fox Ltd are Commercial Management & Property Consultants who act for property investor clients in and around Wakefield, West Yorkshire.
Please leave a comment if you have enjoyed the article or contact Walker Fox on 01924 896190, via email info@walkerfox.co.uk, Skype: walkerfox or connect on Twitter@walkerfox
Privacy
Walker Fox does not share personal information with third-parties nor does Walker Fox store information that is collected about your visit for use other than to analyse content performance through the use of cookies, which you can turn off at anytime by modifying your Internet browser’s settings. Walker Fox is not responsible for the republishing of the content found on this blog on other Web sites or media without permission.
Blog Comments
Walker Fox reserves the right to edit or delete any comments submitted to this blog without notice due to;
1. Comments deemed to be spam or questionable spam
2. Comments including profanity
3. Comments containing language or concepts that could be deemed offensive
4. Comments that attack a person individually
Terms and Conditions
All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. Walker Fox makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. Walker Fox will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. Walker Fox will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.
This policy is subject to change at anytime
Related articles
- Buying investment property with investment clubs – My Story Part 1. (walkerfox.co.uk)
- Buying investment property with investment clubs – My Story Part 2. (walkerfox.co.uk)
Top 4 investment fund and residential property investment in Wakefield
Your Property Club recently published an article about why now is such a great time to invest in property.
Lambda Alpha, it’s the honorary society for the advancement of land economics, a worldwide fraternity of property professionals, made up of architects, solicitors, town planners, academics, developers and a whole host of other property-related people.
Bret Alegre-Wood of Your Property Club is a Board member of the London Chapter, and recently spent a week in Scotland at the annual Land Economics weekend designed to showcase a city’s land economics.
One of the symposiums was hosted by Scottish Widows Investment Fund (SWIP) who are in turn owned by Lloyds who are currently the 4th largest fund in the world, and during the usual dry commentary about Scotland and the benefits of fund management some interesting statistics actually came out that Brett has introduced into his article.
These are the stats that SWIP are basing their investment decisions on over the next five years.
1. They believe that property will be the best performing assets class over at least the next five years (to at least 2016).
2. They believe that it will grow by at least 15% over the next 3 to 5 years due to a lack of supply and a return to lending.
3. They believe this will start in earnest in the middle of 2012.
At Walker Fox, as Property Consultants who specialise in Wakefield, we always maintain that investing in property is a great long term strategy and ‘now’ is always the right time to take action.
After the Symposium, Brett reportedly asked the Fund Manager which sector he felt would be a better investment over the next 5 years. Expecting to hear ‘the commercial sector will see a return to fortune‘ or some other version of the usual party line. (This is typical because residential is normally too small a transaction value for them to consider so therefore it’s not an option.)
The initial answer seemed at first to go down that road: ‘The commercial sector will see increasing yields‘, but after pressing some more, he admitted ‘we’re very upbeat about residential, values have clearly bottomed out and nowhere is the lack of supply more pronounced‘.
Not quite a full admission that residential is better than commercial but it’s a very positive sign to read that a fund manager agrees that residential property is a good investment.
If the fourth biggest fund in the world thinks property is a good investment over the next 5 years it might it be time for YOU to seriously consider jumping in too?
The average property in the Wakefield area has historically been affordable, none more so than in the past couple of months. As with many other regions, prices have risen slightly in April to £121,002, represents an increase of 0.2% as reported by the official statistics from HM Land Registry.
Related articles
- Countdown to flagship art gallery – Walker Fox on Wakefields latest property development (walkerfox.co.uk)
‘Buy to Let’ market continues to improve in Wakefield
The following recent press release is relevant to the property investors who are buying in Wakefield and the surrounding areas as well as the rest of the country and is taken from the official website of the Council of Mortgage Lenders. ‘CML’
Buy-to-let market continues modest improvement

The buy-to-let market grew by 7% in 2010, according to the latest data from the Council of Mortgage Lenders. At the end of the year there were an estimated 1.3 million buy-to-let mortgages outstanding, worth £152 billion, accounting for 12% of the total value (11.5% by number) of mortgages outstanding.
The total value of buy-to-let lending in 2010 was £10.4 billion (22% higher than in 2009), and the total number of loans advanced in the year was 102,000 (10% higher than the previous year).
In the fourth quarter of 2010 there were 28,600 new buy-to-let loans advanced, worth £3 billion. This was a rise of 6% by volume and 7% by value from the third quarter.
In terms of loan performance, the buy-to-let sector has seen a further improvement in the number of mortgages in arrears. While direct comparisons with the owner-occupied sector are difficult because of the additional option of appointing a “receiver of rent” on a buy-to-let loan, the general picture is that the share of arrears cases accounted for by buy-to-let loans is now only just over the overall buy-to-let share of the mortgage stock, having previously been notably higher than the owner-occupied sector. Low interest rates are a key driver of this narrowing of the gap, since the largely interest-only buy-to-let sector gains greater benefit from lower interest payments than the predominantly capital-and-interest owner-occupied sector.
Looking ahead to the prospects for the buy-to-let sector in 2011, the CML expects strong rental demand to remain, driven not least by the continuing deposit constraints to entry to the owner-occupier market.
Commenting on the latest results and the outlook for the buy-to-let market, CML director general Michael Coogan commented:
“Funding remains a key constraint on growth in buy-to-let lending, but demand seems to be resilient and loan performance has improved. Looking ahead, loan performance could potentially be adversely affected by rising rent arrears or interest rate rises, but at present there is no indication of these pressures materialising in practice. There is also a strong counterbalancing growth influence on the buy-to-let market, as tenant demand seems set to remain high in the face of continuing deposit constraints to entering the owner-occupier market.”
Related articles
DIY versus employing tradesmen
A recent survey conducted by Swinton insurance has found that one in five homeowners would rather pay a tradesman to do work on their homes, than do the work themselves. The survey of 1200 people by the insurer found that while 64% of homeowners do work themselves, 20% employ tradesmen to avoid making costly mistakes. With 30% of those questioned admitting they had done themselves an injury while doing DIY, this is probably a sensible statistic.
55% of those questioned also stated that they would use an improvised tool rather than the correct one for the job. Well, it’s quite often thought that undertaking simple or even more complicated property refurbishment tasks would be cheaper than hiring a tradesman. Yes, costs are important in hiring someone to do the job. But the quality of service that a professional tradesman will differ from the kind of job that even a half competent DIY’er can do when balancing a refurbishment with a full-time occupation.
Looking closely at Doing It Yourself
The first question that one would ask perhaps is if you can actually do the job. Of course, a DIY’er will be able to accomplish a given task. There’s no question about that. Through the eagerness to save some cash, many have put it upon themselves to learn how to. In addition to that, DIY stores also have provided the right equipment and materials for a multitude of tasks to be undertaken yourself.
What does a Tradesman have that makes It a better job done?
Yes, a DIY’er may have all the necessary equipment to do a good job. But since many DIY’ers often learn a new task from ‘on the job’ practice and possibly only on one occasion, the thing that he may not have is proper training.
On the other hand, most tradesman (by definition) are trained. Before they get hired or set up on their own, they are often tested according to their skills so, one has an assurance that people who will be working on a project is qualified. After
all, a tradesman should not be or, would not hire someone who lacks in knowledge and skills in their given trade.
Hiring a tradesman should mean that they offer better customer service, they will be concerned not just of quantity but of quality as well.
The Issue of Quality
The more qualified tradesman would, of course, give better quality work. So if one wants quality it’s best that he hires a tradesman instead of attempting the work themselves. Since a tradesman would be concerned of quality as well, there would be quality assurance steps performed on the project. Inspections may be done by their own people to make sure the job was done well. And if one really wants to save, it’s better to hire a tradesman than to attempt a DIY job. The job will likely be done better so it will be more durable. If a DIY’er does attempt a job, the chances are he would have to do it again sooner. So in the long run, hiring a tradesman would be cheaper. That’s because better quality workmanship will be accomplished. And there would be less hassle in the end because, even if a DIY’er can complete a job, a tradesman will almost certainly be able to do the job better.
It’s not just time we’re wasting; the UK throws away £1,400 a year correcting our DIY mishaps. Women come off worst in the waste stakes, spending £80 each to correct their mistakes compared to the £37 men have to pay to make good their DIY disasters, the poll suggests that DIY’ers are throwing away cash by attempting work they should get the professionals in for. The average property apparently has four DIY tasks that need doing according to MyHammer.co.uk, a website that allows tradesman to bid for work being auctioned by homeowners. A quarter of people who started home improvements say they gave up after running out of money.
The survey also revealed a quarter of people have had an accident doing DIY with one in 10 needing hospital treatment for their injury.
More than half of the survey admit they attempt tasks without knowing what they are doing with one in four blokes cutting or hurting themselves using a tool, seven per cent falling off a ladder, six per cent being electrocuted and 1 in 20 flooding the room they were working in. Another three per cent have fallen through a ceiling or floor.
If you found this article interesting, please leave a comment.
Walker Fox offer bespoke property services to private clients, please follow us on Twitter @walkerfox






























